Last year, we had that referendum about whether we wanted to change the way votes were counted, from "first past the post" to "AV" (alternative voting method). Now it was the current prime minister who was one of the leading lights of the "No" campaign, which was basically run on a "don't change it, because it's too complicated" line.
If it was so complicated, then how the fuck do people like me KNOW that that is the exact way that the leaders of the political parties are elected here.
I might just be an ordinary working bloke, but I'm not fucking stupid Cameron. If anyone is, you are, you old Etonian, Oxford educated, rich, tory cunt! I'm not stupid enough, to be patronising to people like that. Even if they might not understand something, give them the benefit of the doubt, they're entitled to that at least.
Now last week, there's some government judicial committee, who apparently says that we need a new law, because a jury wouldn't or couldn't understand the legal point of "Joint Enterprise".
Joint Enterprise ? Well I'll draw an analogy. A gang of youths, possibly young men, go out and commit a crime, lets say a murder. Now there's enough evidence to link some, or all of them to the scene of the crime, yet for a number of reasons, the police might not find enough evidence or proof as to which member of that group/gang/whatever actually committed the murder. Well using the legal point of Joint Enterprise, the law would or could consider them all guilty of the murder charge, and depending on the strength of the evidence linking them to the crime, they're then sentenced accordingly.
Sound familiar ? Yes, that's right. It's how the 2 of 5 suspects were convicted in the "Steven Lawrence" case. Of course, it does seem that because of cock ups by police and/or the CPS at the time, they didn't get all of them, but a jury did find that there was enough evidence to convict the 2....
How to I know this ? Well obviously, according to the Judicial committee I mentioned earlier, I don't because it's too complicated a concept for me, Mr Ordinary Bloke in the Street, to understand.
Don't patronise and/or condescend to me like that you jumped up fucking arseholes.....
I know what it fucking means and suspect that if I was ever called for jury service and had to sit on a case like this, I'd be able to work out exactly what the fuck was going on and whether there was enough proof/evidence of guilt or innocence..........
Wake up you "know it all" government cunts........
No comments:
Post a Comment